RIVERSIDE DISTRICT ATTORNEY RETALIATES ! ! !
The cover-up of misconduct by Corona Police Department Detective, Bruce Bell, continued today when the Riverside County District Attorney re-filed criminal charges against Steven Paul Coleman. (Riverside Superior Court Case RIF129193) Previously, on January 9, 2006, the Honorable Judge Armstrong (Div. 35) in (Riverside Superior Court Case RIF 129459) dismissed all charges against Mr. Coleman for lack of probable cause.
The retaliatory filing by Deputy District Attorney Debra Postil today is in response to the accusations by this writer that Corona Police Department Detecvtive Bruce Bell fabricated Corona Police Report CR 05-08161 and comes on the heels of accusations that the Riverside County Disttrict Attorney has conspired with the Corona Police Department to cover-up Detective Bell's misconduct. Detective Bell fabricated a non-existent burglary charge which forms the basis of the prosecution in both cases.
According to Court documents in Riverside Superior Court Case RIF 129193 the " Arrest Charges" are PC 273.5 (A) (Inflict Corporal Injury/Spouse) and not PC 459 (Burglary) as alleged in the original case. In both cases the events giving rise to criminal liability allegedly occurred on May 24, 2005. What prompted the Corona Police Department to amend the arresting charge from "Burglary" in RIF 129459 to "Inflicting Corporal Injury/Spouse in RIF 1223425? There is no evidence whatsoever of any domestic violence between Lori and Steven Coleman. In fact the last sentence of Detective Bell's narrative in Corona Polixce Report CR 05-08161 attests to that fact. It defies all rhyme and reason .........Unless ... Yes, unless you want to stop Steven Coleman from writing letters and posting Blogs on the Internet.
Just how do you stop someone from exercising their right to Freedom of Speech and stop them from filing complaints ? If that person is on parole all it takes is a telephone call. Never mind that the criminal charges are spurious. It worked well for Detective Bell on June 14, 2005 when I was taken into custody without question. Expecting a repeat performance, Detective Bell, on or about March 7, 2006, contacted my Parole Office once again intent on having me returned to immediate custody. The Parole Office declined to take any action because the charges had already been adjudicated. So a new charge was created by Detective Bell and the Corona Police Department. A new allegation that had not been brouight on June 14, 2005. That charge of course is the PC 273.5(A) (Inflict Corporal Injury/Spouse) . Fortunately for me and as a credit to my Parole Agent and her Supervisor, they declined to take any action.
I am, to be arraigned next Tuesday, March 28, 2006. We will see what has become of the taped statements that the Corona Police Department and the Riverside County Attorney so jealously guard. Have the tapes been destroyed ? Have they gotten lost? Or will a new version be generated ? The malicious prosecution of Steven Coleman continues .......
The retaliatory filing by Deputy District Attorney Debra Postil today is in response to the accusations by this writer that Corona Police Department Detecvtive Bruce Bell fabricated Corona Police Report CR 05-08161 and comes on the heels of accusations that the Riverside County Disttrict Attorney has conspired with the Corona Police Department to cover-up Detective Bell's misconduct. Detective Bell fabricated a non-existent burglary charge which forms the basis of the prosecution in both cases.
According to Court documents in Riverside Superior Court Case RIF 129193 the " Arrest Charges" are PC 273.5 (A) (Inflict Corporal Injury/Spouse) and not PC 459 (Burglary) as alleged in the original case. In both cases the events giving rise to criminal liability allegedly occurred on May 24, 2005. What prompted the Corona Police Department to amend the arresting charge from "Burglary" in RIF 129459 to "Inflicting Corporal Injury/Spouse in RIF 1223425? There is no evidence whatsoever of any domestic violence between Lori and Steven Coleman. In fact the last sentence of Detective Bell's narrative in Corona Polixce Report CR 05-08161 attests to that fact. It defies all rhyme and reason .........Unless ... Yes, unless you want to stop Steven Coleman from writing letters and posting Blogs on the Internet.
Just how do you stop someone from exercising their right to Freedom of Speech and stop them from filing complaints ? If that person is on parole all it takes is a telephone call. Never mind that the criminal charges are spurious. It worked well for Detective Bell on June 14, 2005 when I was taken into custody without question. Expecting a repeat performance, Detective Bell, on or about March 7, 2006, contacted my Parole Office once again intent on having me returned to immediate custody. The Parole Office declined to take any action because the charges had already been adjudicated. So a new charge was created by Detective Bell and the Corona Police Department. A new allegation that had not been brouight on June 14, 2005. That charge of course is the PC 273.5(A) (Inflict Corporal Injury/Spouse) . Fortunately for me and as a credit to my Parole Agent and her Supervisor, they declined to take any action.
I am, to be arraigned next Tuesday, March 28, 2006. We will see what has become of the taped statements that the Corona Police Department and the Riverside County Attorney so jealously guard. Have the tapes been destroyed ? Have they gotten lost? Or will a new version be generated ? The malicious prosecution of Steven Coleman continues .......
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home